|
Agenda |
|
Horton Grand Hotel |
|
San Diego, California |
|
April 2-3, 2008 |
|
|
| Schedule of Meetings | ||||||||
|
|
Wednesday, April 2 |
|
|
| Noon | Joint WIEB Board/WIRAB luncheon |
| 1:00 p.m. | WIRAB 101 (open to all interested parties) |
| Background information | |
| WIRAB home page | |
| Presentation slides | |
| 2:30 p.m. | Break |
| Western Interconnection Regional Advisory Body Annual Meeting | |
| 3:00 p.m. | Convene meeting - John Savage, Chair |
| Perspectives on the implementation of mandatory reliability standards: | |
|
o Dave Nevius, VP NERC |
|
|
o Louise McCarren, CEO WECC |
|
|
o Joe McClelland/Shelton Cannon, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
|
|
· FERC work on cyber security |
|
|
· Coordination with Office of Enforcement on violations and application of penalties |
|
|
Standards and enforcement in Alberta, British Columbia, Mexico |
|
|
(The purpose of this item is to discuss with the key players setting and enforcing grid |
|
|
reliability standards their perceptions of the experience thus far with mandatory |
|
|
standards, expectations in the coming year, and major challenges.) |
|
|
Background information |
|
| FERC action on cyber security standards | |
|
NERC reliability standards development plan: 2008-2010 |
|
|
NERC 2008 compliance monitoring and enforcement implementation plan |
|
| 5:00 p.m. |
WIRAB business meeting |
| · Approval of summary of March 21st meeting | |
| · Public comment | |
|
· Election of chair and vice chair |
|
|
· Review of a proposed 2009 work plan and budget |
|
| · Review of load calculations for WIRAB voting | |
|
|
|
|
(The proposed Calendar Year 2009 WIRAB budget will be submitted to NERC in late |
|
|
spring. The business meeting is a good opportunity to discuss priorities for WIRAB |
|
| in 2009.) | |
| 5:30 p.m |
Adjourn |
| 7:00 a.m. | Continental breakfast |
| 8:30 a.m. | Joint Board/WIRAB/CREPC Workshop on Assessments |
| Purpose and structure of workshop - John Savage, WIRAB and CREPC Chair | |
| 8:45 a.m. | Assessment Context |
| WECC - Louise McCarren (WECC CEO) / others | |
| · Power Supply Assessment | |
| · WECC transmission expansion planning | |
| NERC Long-term Reliability Assessment, including a proposed 15% renewables | |
| scenario in 2008 and 2009 LTRAs | |
| o Dave Nevius, Vice President, NERC [present] | |
| (The purpose of this discussion is to understand the current assessment processes used | |
| by NERC and WECC.) | |
| Background information | |
| WECC 2007 Power Supply Assessment | |
| January 30, 2008 WIRAB Webinar slides | |
| TEPPC 2007 report | |
| TEPPC protocol | |
| NERC 2008 Long-Term Reliability Assessment: scenario instructions | |
| NERC 2007 Long-Term Reliability Assessment | |
| NERC wind integration and transmission webinar | |
| 9:30 a.m. | How to Assess the Transmission Expansion, Resource Adequacy, and |
| Operational Impacts of Significant Renewable Generation in the | |
| Western Interconnection: A Key Building Block to a Low Carbon | |
| Resource Assessment | |
| o Wally Gibson, NWPCC [present] | |
| o Nick Miller, GE [present] | |
| o Brian Parsons, National Rewnewable Energy Laboratory [present] | |
| o Mike Jaske, CEC [present] | |
| (The purpose of this panel is to identify ways to assess transmission expansion, | |
| resource adequacy and operational impacts of integrating large amounts of | |
| renewables in the Western Interconnection.) | |
| 10:45 a.m. | Break |
| 11:00 a.m. | Assessment Task: Low carbon resource mix in 2018 |
| (CO2 levels 15% below 2005 levels in 2020) | |
| (In response to continuing changes in public policy objectives that are impacting | |
| resource priorities of Western load-serving entities, WIRAB has requested that | |
| WECC, as part of its 2008 transmission expansion study work, evaluate the | |
| transmission implication of changes to the Western electric power system that | |
| would reduce CO2 emissions to 15% below 2005 levels by 2020. This is the | |
| goal of the Western Climate Initiative and the leading climate change legislation | |
| in Congress. WIRAB's requested study will also better position WECC if it | |
| evaluates the impact of carbon limits as part of a NERC-required Long-Term | |
| Reliability Assessment. Evaluating the impacts of a low carbon electricity | |
| future is challenging.) | |
| Parameters and approaches to meeting the analytic challenge | |
| o Tom Carr, WIEB (overview of the magnitude of changes needed to meet goal) [present] | |
| o Jeff King, Northwest Power and Conservation Council (observations from | |
| NWPCC's examination of how to reduce carbon emissions in the Northwest) [present] | |
| o Mike Jaske, California Energy Commission (observations from CEC's work on | |
| compliance with AB 32) [present] | |
| Background information | |
| CEC, Scenario Analyses of California's Electricity System | |
| CEC, Scenario Analyses, Addendum 3 | |
| Carbon Dioxide Footprint of the Northwest Power System | |
| Noon | Lunch on your own |
| 1:30 p.m. | LSE resources planners - What changes in generation mix could meet the carbon reduction goal? |
| o Rob Anderson, San Diego Gas & Electric | |
| o Jim Lobdell, VP, Power Operations & Resource Strategy, Portland GE [present] | |
| o Paul Smith, Arizona Public Service | |
| o Greg Duvall, Director, Long Range Planning & Net Power Costs, PacifiCorp | |
| o Charlie Black, resource planning & acquisition services consultant to | |
| multiple Northwest utilities [present] | |
| (The purpose of this panel are to: (1) gain insights from LSE resource planners on | |
| the low-carbon demand and supply side options available in the Western | |
| Interconnection; (2) determine the value of establishing a Western Interconnection | |
| forum for sharing information on low-carbon resource options.) | |
| Panel questions including: | |
| » What resource choices do you see for Western LSEs to meet carbon limits? | |
| » What new resources should be developed? To what extent are western LSEs | |
| going to rely on buying offsets or carbon credits? | |
| » In the face of growing demand, what strategies should Western LSEs implement | |
| to reduce emissions below current levels ? Are coal plants going to be backed off? | |
| » How would you evaluate various risks (e.g., future significant carbon limits, | |
| natural gas prices) when considering demand side and supply side resource | |
| acquisition options? | |
| » What actions should state/provinces and FERC take to reduce the cost of | |
| providing power at the lowest cost possible while meeting significant carbon | |
| limits? | |
| Background information | |
| LBNL Study Assesses Western Utilities’ Plans to Respond to Possible Future | |
| Carbon Emission Regulation | |
| 4:00 p.m. | Break |
| 4:30 p.m. | WIRAB Transmission Expansion Study Request |
| · WIRAB study request - Doug Larson, WIEB [present] | |
| · WECC action on 2008 study requests - Steve Walton, TEPPC facilitator [present] | |
| · Discussion of requisites for executing the analysis of a low carbon scenario | |
| (The purpose of this discussion is to allow WIRAB and CREPC members to raise | |
| questions and make suggestions on the assumptions to be used in modeling a | |
| low-carbon resource scenario.) | |
| Background information | |
| WIRAB low carbon scenario study request | |
| TEPPC 2008 tentative study plan | |
| Views on the use of results of regional transmission planning | |
| o WECC - Louise McCarren/Steve Walton | |
| o FERC - Commissioner Moeller/Shelton Cannon | |
| o CREPC - John Savage (OR) / Steve Ellenbecker and others | |
| Discussion topics: | |
| » How do states see the role of WECC and subregional planning? Should WECC | |
| and subregions only present results of transmission studies or should they make | |
| recommendations on transmission projects that make the most sense from the | |
| perspective of supporting reliability, improving system economics, or | |
| supporting state RPS goals? | |
| » Should WECC and subregions only present results of transmission studies or | |
| should they make recommendations on transmission projects that make the most | |
| sense from the perspective of supporting reliability, improving system | |
| economics, or supporting state RPS goals? | |
| » Are there any instances where failure to build a transmission project will result | |
| in violations of grid reliability standards? | |
| » What role should FERC play in defining the beneficiaries of proposed | |
| transmission projects? | |
| 5:30 p.m. | Adjourn workshop |