|
Agenda
|
|
Double Tree Lloyd Center |
|
Portland, Oregon |
|
April 3-4, 2006 |
|
casual attire (no ties) |
|
|
| Schedule of Meetings | ||||||||
|
|
Monday, April 3 |
|
|
| 12 noon | Luncheon for Board members |
| 1:00 p.m. | Call to order |
| Outline agenda | |
| Approve minutes of February 2006 Salt Lake City and September 2005 San Diego meetings | |
| Report on Board and Committee activities | |
| Presentation on proposed FY 2006-2007 work plan and budget (action on the work plan/budget would be taken on Tuesday after discussion of future Board and WAG activities). [workplan presentation] | |
| Election of officers | |
| 2:15 p.m. | Priorities of Western Governors and role of the Board |
| · Next steps and potential post-June actions on the Clean & Diversified Energy Initiative | |
| o Pam Inmann, WGA Executive Director (via conference call) [presentation] | |
| · Emerging energy issues in Washington, D.C. | |
| o Kevin Moran, WGA Washington, D.C. Director (via conference call) | |
| · WRAP work on climate change | |
| o Patrick Cummins, WGA (via conference call) | |
| · Expiring WGA energy-related resolutions | |
| Western States Energy Policy Roadmap | |
| Protecting the Reliability of the Western Electric Power System | |
| o Doug Larson, WIEB | |
| 3:30 p.m. | Break |
| 3:45 p.m. | Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships |
| · Reports from four western partnerships (via conference call) | |
| Ed Steadman, Plains CO2 Reduction Partnership [presentation] | |
| Susan Capalbo, Big Sky Carbon Sequestration Partnership [presentation] | |
| Larry Myer, West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership [presentation] | |
| Brian McPherson, Southwest Regional Partnership on Carbon Sequestration [presentation] | |
| Background material | |
| Plains CO2 Reduction Partnership | |
| Big Sky Carbon Sequestration Partnership | |
| West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership | |
| Southwest Regional Partnership on Carbon Sequestration | |
| 4:45 p.m. | Western energy emergency exercise in Salt Lake City on June 14-15 |
| · Tony Usibelli, WA [presentation] | |
| 5:30 p.m. | Recess |
| 6:30 p.m. | Board dinner |
|
Tuesday, April 4 |
| 8:00 a.m. | Continental breakfast |
| 8:30 a.m. | Roundtable on recent Western state/provincial energy policy actions with particular emphasis on policies related to climate change and the regional implications of such policies |
| Background material | |
| Alberta | |
| Arizona | |
| British Columbia | |
| California handout | |
| Colorado | |
| Idaho | |
| Montana | |
| Nevada | |
| New Mexico | |
| Oregon handout | |
| Saskatchewan presentation | |
| Utah | |
| Washington climate change handout; renewable energy handout | |
| Wyoming | |
| Background information | |
| Climate Change White Paper; prepared by Senators Domenici and Bingaman | |
| 10:30 a.m. | Break |
| 10:45 a.m. | Briefing by the CEC Natural Gas Team on Joint WIEB/CEC natural gas adequacy analysis |
| Jim Fore and CEC Team (via conference call) [presentation] | |
| 12:00 p.m. | Action on FY 2006-2007 Work Plan and Budget |
| 12:30 p.m. | Lunch on your own |
| 2:00 p.m. | Preparations for operation of a Western Interconnection Regional Advisory Body |
| Overview of functions and responsibilities of a WIRAB and likely near-term issues | |
| · Bill Chamberlain, CA | |
| · Doug Larson, WIEB | |
| Discussion of WIRAB operational issues | |
| · Voting procedures | |
| o Review of state/provincial consumption data | |
| · Meeting notices and summaries | |
| · Procedures for petitions or presentations to the WIRAB | |
| · Procedures for conveying advice from the WIRAB | |
| · WIRAB web site | |
| · Staffing and budget | |
| 3:30 p.m. | Scoping of potential issues the WIRAB may need to address |
| Below are several potential issues the Board may want to discuss. This discussion may help to provide a common base of information to enable Board members to move expeditiously to develop advice on specific issues if the WIRAB is created. | |
| · Are proposed funding mechanisms and budgets for the ERO and WECC just, | |
| reasonable and in the public interest? | |
| o Is the proposed method of collecting mandatory dues reasonable? | |
|
What are the alternatives? |
|
|
o
Is the proposed fee
collection system equitable?
Will Western consumers |
|
| be paying for ERO activities that do not add value in the Western Interconnection? | |
|
o
Are the WECC and ERO
procedures for developing and submitting proposed |
|
| budgets to FERC and Provincial regulatory authorities reasonable? | |
|
o What would be the
estimated size of first year WECC and ERO budgets that |
|
| would be supported bymandatory fees? When would the budget year begin? | |
| What are the five-year projections of WECC and ERO budgets? | |
| o What current and proposed WECC and ERO activities would be financed by | |
|
mandatory fees?
|
|
| What WECC and ERO activities would be financed with voluntary contributions? | |
|
§
Do any of the
activities not financed by mandatory dues present a conflict |
|
| with the reliability-related activities financed by mandatory dues? | |
| § Are Western Interconnection Reliability Centers (which constitute a | |
| majority of the WECC budget) to be financed with mandatory dues? | |
| Should the functions of such centers be expanded or consolidated? | |
| Background information | |
| WECC funding issues (priority 2) | |
| · Is the governance of the ERO and WECC just, reasonable and in the public | |
|
interest? |
|
|
·
What should be the
process for developing and
evaluating proposed reliability |
|
| standards? | |
|
o
Would an |
|
| adequate? | |
|
o
Should an evaluation
of the costs and benefits of proposed standard be required? |
|
| Who should do such an evaluation – WECC, ERO, FERC? | |
|
o
How must the
existing WECC Reliability Management System standards and |
|
| penalty process evolve under Section 215 of the Federal Power Act? | |
| o How will the deference provisions to proposed interconnection-wide | |
|
standards be implemented? |
|
| · What should be the process for enforcing standards? | |
| o What should be the penalties for non-compliance? | |
| o How should the process for appealing violations operate? | |
| o What access should the WIRAB and state regulatory authorities have to | |
| information on violation of standards? | |
| o How can public disclosure of violations encourage compliance? | |
| · Is the proposed ERO-WECC delegation agreement just, reasonable and in the | |
| public interest? | |
| o Under the agreement, how will proposed Western Interconnection reliability | |
| standards be developed, reviewed and approved? | |
| o What are the roles of WECC and the ERO in enforcing standards? In | |
| processing appeals? In levying penalties? | |
| o How will the WECC budget be developed, submitted and approved? What is | |
| the role of the ERO in reviewing and modifying the WECC budget? | |
| o Under what conditions can the delegation agreement be modified? | |
| o What approvals of the delegation agreement (and modifications) will be | |
| required from FERC, Alberta, British Columbia, and Mexico? | |
| · What role, if any, does the WIRAB want to play in readiness audits or | |
| performance reviews of WECC and the ERO? | |
| · How can regulatory review and approval processes in Alberta, British Columbia | |
| and Mexico be coordinated with FERC review and approval processes? | |
| · How does the WIRAB want to consult with DOE under Section 1221 of the | |
|
Energy Policy Act? |
|
| 5:00 p.m. | Adjourn Board meeting |