2001 WGA resolution - Negotiated
Indian Water Rights Settlements
April 24, 2001 briefing agenda
Summary of April 24th Congressional Briefing on Indian
Water Right Settlements
Mike Jackson's remarks on on 6/23/01
Mike Connor's remarks on 4/24/01
Domenici letter
Q&A on Domenici proposal
April 24th briefing attendees list
Ad Hoc Group letter to Interior (1/2001)
Ad Hoc Group members
WGA Letter on Funding (1999)
WSWC resolution
National
Congress of American Indians resolution
Western Regional Council Description
WSWC/NARF Symposium in October 2001
|
|
Ad Hoc Group on
Indian Water Rights
ARCHIVE -- This page no longer being updated. (1/1/04)
The Ad Hoc Group on Indian Water Rights is an organization comprised of
the Western Regional Council, the Western Governors’ Association, the
Native American Rights Fund and the Western States Water Council. New York
Governor George Pataki's Federal Affairs Office has also become a member
in the last couple of years due to the interest in settling land claims in
New York. For several years now, the Ad Hoc Group has endeavored to
encourage support for Indian land and water rights in the hopes of
avoiding prolonged and expensive litigation. Past settlements have proven
they can satisfy the interests of affected Indians and non-Indians.
Importantly, they can also meet the trust responsibilities of the United
States relative to the Tribes, if they do not deprive Tribes of funding
for other vital programs.
Indian Land Claims – Prior to the American Revolution and the
formation of the United States, various Indian tribes existed with
sovereign governments and land boundaries which reached from Southern
Canada to the Carolinas and from Maine to the West. In the years that
followed, it is estimated that approximately ninety percent of our
forty-eight contiguous states was purchased from the Indians by means of
treaties or other agreements. The Non-Intercourse Act of 1790 provided
that no Indian land transfer could be made without the supervision of the
Federal Government and the ratification of Congress. Violations of the
Non-Intercourse Act have been the legal basis of many land claim lawsuits.
Key land settlements are currently being negotiated in New York, Texas,
Louisiana, and Illinois.
Indian Water Rights – The concept of reserved water rights
originated from the landmark case Winters v. United States, 207
U.S. 564 (1908). The Winters doctrine simply states that when the
federal government established a reservation, the government implicitly
reserved a quantity of water necessary to fulfill the purposes of the
reservation. Historically, costly and protracted litigation was the
general method used to quantify Winters rights, and often it
resulted in "paper" water only. Beginning in the 1980's, there
was an effort made toward encouraging negotiated Indian water rights
settlements. These negotiated settlements proved to be a much more
effective means of quantifying Winters rights, and they resulted in
"wet" water to the tribes.
In light of settlements recently approved by the last Congress and
settlements that are anticipated during the 107th Congress, the Ad Hoc
Group on Indian Water Rights sponsored a Congressional briefing on April
24, 2001. The purpose of the briefing was to discuss and share
perspectives on important issues associated with Indian land and water
settlements, particularly with regard to alternative mechanisms for
funding of the settlements. The following are links to the information
that was distributed for the April 24 briefing.
|