Environmental Summit on the West II
Recommendations from Breakout Groups
Implementation
of the Enlibra Principles is moving ahead on many diverse fronts the
activities are exciting and innovative.
Effective
application takes bipartisan leadership and commitment from all stakeholder
sectors and levels of government and a lot of hard work and resources (time,
people and money).
Non-governmental
stakeholders should drive the use of Enlibra when effective partnerships can be
created.
Important
for leadership to assist in determining whose process is it and the
appropriate level of scale for the application of the principles.
Stakeholders
and leaders need to work to ensure the broadest possible participation.
Others
to
be determined at Policy Roundtable
MULTI-POLLUTANT
LEGISLATION
FOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES
Continue
to work on issues through a western, stakeholder process to achieve consensus
Engage
with Administration and Congress to ensure western issues are addressed in
legislation
Key
issues for western interests:
Need details on proposed regulatory
changes (NSR, etc.)
Agree on option to preserve WRAPs
SO2 program
Determine appropriate NOx program for
the West
Ensure fair allocations for western
states and tribes; address new sources and credit for early reductions
Address needs of non-utility sources
Key Messages:
-
CBM situation is polarized, but
participants are optimistic that collaborative processes can work.
-
Collaboration must be streamlined,
power balanced, time dilemmas understood, long and short term goals
prioritized.
-
Private/surface owner relationships
are an issue for all parties.
-
Best practices are out there, but
inconsistently applied.
-
More information and data sharing.
-
Collaboration
BMP workshops convened by WGA (WRAP-type
model)
- Surface owner relations
- Operational practices
- Surface stewardship
- Specifics on geographic areas
- Split estate issues
- Enforcement issues
Standards
- Enforce and update existing laws
- Innovative enforcement (self-certification)
- Adequate inspections
- Appropriate actions
Rewards
- Surface property rights
- Emphasize positive outcomes, success stories
- Positive incentives
Science, process
- Central database, technology transfer
- Objective dependable research and baseline information
- Produced water management
Permitting
Interstate Transmission
Collaborative
draft protocol will work.
BLM/FS
ready to participate (except need). Protect
confidentiality, reassess deadlines, and avoid delays.
DOD,
EPA, FERC, USFWS, DOE should consider
Include
mechanism for public in project teams
Include
line upgrades and line maintenance
Digitize,
standardize and publish information
Need
regional planning process that precedes protocols project-by-project
review process:
Determine
need (including generation location)
Clarify
who should pay for new transmission
Recognize
constraints from existing infrastructure and processes (e.g., existing
corridors)
Protocol
and planning process should provide predictability and certainty.
Siting
of Energy Infrastructure
Coordination
and Collaboration between state and federal agencies
Governors
must exercise more leadership in getting state agencies to coordinate
Standardize
deadlines and sequenced review infuse a culture of getting the job done. Reward
results
An
effective process must include all typesgeneration, pipelines, transmission,
construction, maintenance
Use funding from applicants to support
analyses. Good analyses promote good decisions
Develop
North American Energy Strategy that includes opportunities between all three
countries
Perform
a consolidated environmental review so all agencies are working from the same
document. Environmental understanding is crucial.
Renewable
Energy Credits -- FINDINGS
RECs
are flexible tools that improve the efficiency of market transactions.
RECs
should be used in conjunction with other strategies.
RECs
need clear definitions and credible registry.
Facilitates
transactions.
Maintain
confidence in the REC.
RECs
enhance the effectiveness of public policies to increase demand renewable
energy.
Renewable Energy Credits -- RECOMMENDATIONS
Western
Governors should:
Consult
with Tribal governments.
Recognize
western interconnect as appropriate geography for registry.
Support
development of regional generation tracking system.
Endorse
a single REC accrediting body.
Renewables
on Federal Lands
Need
better scientific resource assessment and reduce time in leasing and
permitting.
Recommendations:
Zoning
of areas for renewable development
Programmatic
EIS to address generic issues
Adequate
agency resources and more information supplied by applicants
BIA/BLM
collaboration
National
policy on BLM/FS wind leasing
Collaborative
multi-interest task force on permitting policies
Timelines
for agency action
Point
agency/point persons
Open
military lands for geothermal development
Seek
opportunities for agencies to purchase/use renewables
Information
clearinghouse among NGOs
Market incentives
Expand
production tax credit
Consider
state/regional Renewable Portfolio Standards
Exemption
PVs from sales tax
1)
Governors support of collaborative processes is critical to create the climate
for success
2)
Funding is needed for collaborative planning, studies, and implementation
3)
Significant action soon is essential need to be proactive in addressing
species issues
4)
Need to ensure results/implementation of collaborative processes - and that they
are not derailed at the last minute
5)
Make room for experimental actions eg provide Pilot authority
6)
Need for shared responsibility costs and decision making
7)
Need to use adaptive management principles, including sound science
8)
Governors
need to encourage relevant local, state, & federal agencies to be
players in collaborative efforts, and to make sure of appropriate
financing.
9)
Multiple species conservation plans should be encouraged
10)
Accommodate local solutions in federal and state decisions
11)
Build on Safe Harbor provisions - Section 10 Permitting
Interstate Transmission
Meeting
Growing and Competing Demands for Water
Link
watershed planning with local entities
Fund
watershed initiatives
Redirect
funding to on-the-ground projects
Support
Indian water right settlements
Two
Indian water right settlements per Congress
Enact
National Drought Preparedness Act
Collaborative
science investigations
Early
implementation and adaptive management
Land
Conservation
Lessons learned
Partnerships
work.
Funding
is necessary for success.
Creative
approaches are critical.
Recommendations
Reward
and support ($) community level partnerships.
Use
coalitions (like WGA) to support land conservation legislation (e.g. Forest
Legacy, Farm Bill).
Use
land trades, pooling agreements, land purchases and land sales
Fund
conservation easements, land acquisition, including operating costs.
Fund
statewide measures including public funding.
Pass
state tax credits.
Find
better ways to value aesthetics, environmental benefits, etc.
Explore
conditional or short-term conservation easements.
Continue
to expand tool box.
Land
Conservation Decision Support Systems:
Use
the technology in land use planning for private and public lands.
Secure
funding for comprehensive baseline data and acquire it.
Use
DSS in budgeting for land conservation.
Provide
access to tools and training for rural America.
Incorporate
community values in DSS (e.g. scenic values, community/cultural heritage,
working landscapes, recreating).
Include
local expertise in DSS tools.
Create
incentives to include science in planning.
Industrial Environmental Innovations: Value for
Community, Global and Bottom Line Strategies for Industrial Production
- Provide incentives to encourage innovation at all levels of
government
- Create flexibility and allow creativity with accountability in
regulatory programs to allow for innovation
- Encourage the use of innovative technologies and processes that turn
waste into product
- Provide a forum for information sharing between stakeholders on lessons
learned in collaborative processes (WGA)
- Support collaboration across state lines on innovative environmental
technologies (WGA)
Lessons
learned
Collaboration
is keyarises from need or crisis
Start
small, in zone of agreement, to build trust.
It takes time.
Incentives
are necessary
Leadership
helps get parties to the table
Apply
good science
Coordinate
at community level between supply, investment and capacity
Align
with community culture and context identify needs and capacities.
To
date, projects usually require incentives, subsidies and investments
Recommendation
We
want to send a clear message to decision-makers that we want to use
collaborative, place-based processes and retain the opportunity to both reduce
wildland/urban interface hazards and restore fire-prone forest ecosystems.
We dont want to lose capacity to make prudent, rational decisions at
the local level.
|