Demand Side Management

ACTIVITIES | DOCUMENTS | CORRESPONDENCE

 

The purpose of the State-Provincial Steering Committee's DSM Work Group is to ensure that WECC's reference case for transmission planning studies accurately reflects existing DSM programs and policies and to develop high DSM scenarios for a more comprehensive evaluation of potential demand-side actions (energy efficiency, demand response, distributed generation) as part of transmission expansion planning studies. The work group will work closely with WECC's Transmission Expansion Planning Policy Committee in executing SPSC DSM study requests, and will maintain ongoing communications with the full SPSC.

If you would like to become involved in the activities of this work group, please send an email to sharon@westgov.org asking to be added to the DSM Work Group listserve. If you have questions or suggestions regarding the activities of the DSM Work Group, please contact Lisa Schwartz (lschwartz@raponline.org; 541-990-9526) or Steve Ellenbecker (sellenbecker@westgov.org; 303-573-8910).

 

2011 SPSC High DSM Study Case Supporting Documents
 

The DSM Work Group has completed the development of methodologies and technical data in support of its 2011 High DSM/DG study requests. The following set of excel spreadsheets identify the Energy Efficiency (EE), Demand Response (DR) and Distributed Generation (DG) resource levels in the study case, which have been forwarded to WECC staff.

 
EE Savings and Load Forecasts
High DG Capacity Numbers
SPSC High DSM Case DR resource levels
 
In addition, the two PDF documents explain: the DR modeling assumptions and dispatch methodology and the methodology used to develop the DG numbers
 
WECC DR Modeling Assumptions High DSM Case Proposal
WECC High DG Methodology Report

 

December 16, 2011 WECC webinar on Energy Efficiency (EE) and Demand Response (DR) Assumptions for the 2022 WECC Common Case
 

WECC is holding a series of five webinars highlighting major inputs in the WECC 2022 Common Case.   The December 16, 2011 webinar focused on the Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Assumptions.    These inputs were presented by Galen Barbose and Andy Satchwell of LBNL, reflecting their work for the SPSC DSM Work Group.  Below, please find their presentations in the webinar, along with the presentation of Heidi Pacini, WECC Staff Engineer, introducing summarizing WECC’s 2022 Common Case assumtions.

Pacini summary of common case assumptions LBNL summary of EE & DR assumptions

 

Demand Response (DR) potential
in the 2011 SPSC High DSM Case
 

On December 12, 2011, initial results of the Demand Response (DR) potential in the 2011 SPSC HIgh DSM Case were circulated to the DSM Work Group for review and feedback. Feedback directly to Andy Satchwell at LBNL (asatchwell@lbl.gov) was requested by Friday, December 16. LBNL subcontracted with The Brattle Group to update DR potential estimates from the FERC 2009 National Assessment of Demand Response Potential. The updated DR potential estimates reflect major developments in DR program design, enrollment, and participation.

High level results of the updated model are:

1) For the Enhanced-BAU scenario, the previous WECC-wide DR impact was 6% (2019); updated model is 7% (2022).
2) For the Achievable Participation scenario, the previous WECC-wide DR impact was 13% (2019); updated model is 14% (2022).
 
The updates are described in detail in a PDF provided below, along with a copy of the Dec. 12 distribution memo briefly explaining the analysis and results. Also included below, is the state-level DR potential in the High DSM case for review by Work Group participants, consisting of several worksheets, organized under an "Assumptions" Tab and "Results" Tab. The Dec .12 distribution memo accompanying these documents includes additional guidance for reviewing the documents.
DR potential in SPSC High DSM case update SPSC DSM Work Group memo SPSC High DSM Case Demand Response

 

SPSC 2011 High DSM Scenario
“Energy Efficiency Savings Projections”
 
On November 28, 2011, the following EE assumptions and calculations in the 2011 HighDSM/DG case were distributed to the DSM Work Group for review and feedback no later than Dec. 16. EE results are shown for each state and province, with the exception of the Pacific Northwest, where results are consolidated in a single document since they are keyed off the Council's 6th Plan.
AB NM
AZ NV
BC PNW
CA UT
CO WY

 

November 18, 2011 DSM Work Group Meeting Summary

On November 18, 2011, Chairman Wagner convened a meeting of the DSM Work Group by webinar to discuss inputs to the 2011 SPSC High DSM/DG study case. The topics discussed and slides are posted below:
 
  • Methodology/results of the DG resource market penetration estimates for High DSM/DG case [pdf]

o Arne Olson, E3

  • Methodology and results of the EE savings assumptions in the High DSM/DG case [pdf]

o Galen Barbose, LBNL

  • Update on the development of DR methodology and schedule for release of data for WG review and feedback [pdf]

o Andy Satchwell, LBNL

 

 

October 10, 2011 DSM Work Group Meeting Summary

On October 10, 2011, Chairman Wagner convened a meeting of the DSM Work Group by webinar. The topics discussed and slides are posted below:
 
  • Review of the WG activities thus far in 2011 and the work that lies ahead [pdf]

o Commissioner Rebecca Wagner, DSM WG Chair

  • TEPPC 2011 study case scoping form - SPSC High DSM/DG study case [pdf]

o Galen Barbose, LBNL

  • Update on WECC Common Case and strawman proposals for High DSM case [pdf]

o Galen Barbose and Andy Satchwell, LBNL

  • Approach for Distributed Generation (DG) estimates [pdf #1]; [pdf #2]

o Arne Olsen, E3

 
October 13, 2011 DSM Work Group follow-up

In the course of the October 10th DSM Workgroup conference call, several follow-up questions were posed for Work Group participants, which are summarized in the attached memo.

 

2011 DSM Study Activities

 

Last year, the DSM Work Group played a key role in determining state-adjusted load forecasts that fully accounted for expected energy efficiency from existing programs and policies – the SPSC Reference Case – and developing the High DSM scenario that reflected acquisition of all cost-effective energy efficiency. 

In 2011, the SPSC Reference Case will serve as WECC’s “Common Case” for transmission planning, so our work takes on greater importance. We also will be providing guidance on new issues, including:

• Energy efficiency and demand response assumptions for WECC’s first 20-year studies

• Incorporating distributed generation in the high DSM cases (10- and 20-year)

• A geographically-targeted high DSM case

               The Work Group will initially provide input on two first priority 10-year analyses:

1. The updated SPSC Reference Case/WECC Common Case, in the June-August time frame

2. The High DSM / Distributed Generation case in the September-December time frame     

                This will be followed by an analogous set of 20-year cases and the development of a geographically targeted High DSM/distributed generation case.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory will again lead the technical analysis, and this year Lisa Schwartz from the Regulatory Assistance Project will provide direct support to the Work Group.

 

Documents

 

2011 Energy Efficiency and Demand Response
Adjustments for TEPPC 2022 Common Case

 

The DSM Work Group has completed our technical analysis of energy efficiency (EE) and demand response (DR) adjustments to the WECC 2022 Common Case, and has submitted these proposed adjustments to TEPPC.  The following information on  the analysis  includes links to the relevant documents.

Energy Efficiency Adjustments

SPSC’s proposed adjustments to the Balancing Authority (BA) load forecasts  account for the expected impact of current EE policies and program plans.  The file which is available via this link consists of two tables showing the % adjustments to the monthly energy and monthly peak demand (respectively) for each BA.

An  18-page document has been prepared describing the methodology used to develop the EE adjustments, including an explanation of the underlying rationale supporting the adjustments for each BA.  This document includes several charts showing the magnitude of adjustments and summarizing results.  The document is available here.

An analysis file containing the data, assumptions, and calculations used to develop the EE adjustments for each BA is available here.

Demand Response Adjustments

A summary of the recommended adjustments to the BA non-firm load forecasts (dispatchable demand response)  in the WECC 2022 Common Case is available here.  

A spreadsheet containing the data supporting the DR adjustments is available here.

The transmission planning studies conducted by WECC utilize a production cost model (PROMOD) to model the dispatch of generation and  DR resources in the Western Interconnection.  The DSM WG has proposed several DR modeling assumptions for use in the WECC 2022 Common Case.  A discussion of these proposals is available here.

 

SPSC /DSM Working Group Approval of
“SPSC - Adjusted State Load Forecasts”

The following Table is meant to facilitate tracking the review and approval process for “SPSC-Adjusted State Load Forecasts" identified in Commissioner Dian Grueneich’s memo of July 9. These forecasts are intended to be used in developing the TEPPC 2020 reference case, and will serve as the base in developing other specific DSM scenario requests. Below, under Documents (dated July 22) please find an explanation of the analytical steps taken to adjust State Load forecasts to reflect anticipated Federal Lighting and Appliance Standards. As identified in Commissioner Grueneich's email, we must work within the TEPPC schedule to complete our review. The deadline for SPSC member approval is August 4. Separate communications are being sent to individual SPSC and DSM Work Group members to facilitate the review and approval process.

Member
State/Province

LBNL Load Forecast
Sent to
DSM WG

Link to
Adjusted Load Forecast

DSM WG
Approval
Date

SPSC
Approval
Date

Alberta
no change
from BA forecast
July 27, 2010
Arizona
July 12, 2010
August 2, 2010
August 4, 2010
British Columbia
no change
from BA forecast
August 5, 2010
August 4, 2010
California
July 12, 2010
July 16, 2010
July 23, 2010
Colorado
July 15, 2010
July 16, 2010
August 3, 2010
Idaho
July 12, 2010
July 16, 2010
August 2, 2010
Montana
July29, 2010
August 5, 2010
New Mexico
July 29, 2010
August 9, 2010
Nevada
July 12, 2010
July 16, 2010
July 30, 2010
Oregon
July 12, 2010
July 30, 2010
August 4, 2010
South Dakota
no change
from BA forecast
 
July 27, 2010
Texas
no change
from BA forecast
 
July 30, 2010
Utah
July 12, 2010
July 16, 2010
August 4, 2010
Washington
July 12, 2010
July 16, 2010
August 2, 2010
Wyoming
July 28, 2010
August 4, 2010
August 4, 2010
       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High DSM Scenario
“2010 TEPPC Study Request”

The following Table reflects the results of the High DSM Scenario study request to TEPPC. The specific elements of this request will be submitted to TEPPC by early October, 2010. The results are compiled and shown in the Table by individual state/province. The High DSM study purpose and methodology are explained in the Documents and Correspondence sections of this website, following this Table, under the date of September 3, 2010. The results of the High DSM analysis are summarized under the correspondence section in a memo dated October 19, 2010.

Member
State/Province

High DSM Scenario

Alberta
Arizona
British Columbia
California
Colorado
Idaho
Montana
New Mexico
Nevada
Oregon
South Dakota  
Texas  
Utah
Washington
Wyoming
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Type Date Name
10-10-11 SPSC Demand-Side Management Work Group Webinar
10-10-11 TEPPC Study Scoping Form
10-10-11 Update on WECC Common Case and Strawman Proposals
10-10-11 E3 High DG Case
10-10-11 DG policies for WECC Common Case
08-08-11 Demand Response Modeling Assumptions - WECC Common Case
08-04-11 WECC Common Case Adjustments
08-04-11 Explanation of BA Adjustments
08-04-11 Analysis File for BA Adjustments
08-04-11 WECC Non-Firm Load Forecast Adjustments in the Common Case
08-04-11 2021 LRS Non-Firm Load Forecasts - SPSC Adjustments
07-18-11 DG Policies for WECC Common Case
07-18-11 BA Adjustments for WECC Common Case
07-18-11 WECC Common Case Load Forecast Adjustments
07-18-11 WECC NonFirm Load Forecast Adjustments
07-14-11 Process Diagram for TEPPC Approval of SPSC Common Case Inputs
07-14-11 Proposed Changes to Balancing Authority Non-firm Load Forecasts
07-14-11 Proposed Energy Efficiency Adjustments and Distributed Generation Assumptions
06-03-11 DSM Working Group Activities for the 2011 TEPPC Study Cycle
06-03-11 Definition of DG in SPSC - High DSM/DG Case
10-08-10 Preliminary High DSM Results
10-08-10 High DSM Forecasts
09-03-10
09-02-10
07-22-10 Federal Standards in the Reference Case
01-26-10 High DSM Proposal to SPSC
     

 

Correspondence

Type Date Name

 

10-13-11 DSM Work Group follow-up memo from October 10
08-04-11 Memo from Chair on TEPPC Common Case progress report
07-11-11 Memo from Chair setting July 14 webinar
06-16-11 SPSC DSM WG feedback request - energy efficiency assumptions and DG definition
06-14-11 Summary and next steps following the June 3, 2011 DSM Work Group Webinar
06-01-11
June 1 Chair's memo setting June 3 DSM webinar
05-25-11
May 25 memo announcing June 3 DSM WG webinar
10-19-10
09-03-10
08-12-10

SPSC DSM Working Group Progress Report and Next Steps

07-23-10 Final Review and SPSC Approval of Adjusted State Load Forecasts
07-09-10 DSM issues and the TEPPC process
06-16-10 WECC Load Forecast Assumptions
"SPSC Study Request to TEPPC"
12-07-09 Organization of workgroup

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Members

 

Rebecca Wagner,
Chair, NV PUC
 
Jeff Ackerman, CO PUC
Scott Barillaro, BC
Howard Schwartz, WA
Wayne Hart, ID
Angela Tanghetti, CEC
Juliet Johnson, OR
Craig McDonnell, NV
Brian DeKiep, MT PSC
John Harvey, UT
Dina Mackin, CA PUC
Michelle Bohanan, WY PSC
 
(ex-officio)
Galen Barbose, LBNL
Chuck Goldman, LBNL
Tom Miller, PGE
Howard Geller, SWEEP
Charlie Grist, NWPCC
Fred Huette, NWEnergy
Carl Zichella, NRDC
Carol Hunter, RMP
Mason Emnett, FERC
Laura Sanchez, NRDC
Wally Gibson, NWCouncil
Jamie Austin, Pacificorp
Arne Olson, E3
Kelly Smith, JCI
Ken Corum, NWCouncil
Brad Davids, ENERNOC
Pete Pengilly, ID PWR
 
|
|
|